I agree completely, what the motoring press does do is applaud their design excellence when they bring new engines to market, the twin charger being the best by far engine brought to market by any car maker - history is not kind to that engine and VAG binned it.wolfie wrote: Of late VW appear to have forgotten how to build a good reliable engine of any size, yet the motoring press never seem to pick up on it.
I just wish that engine manufacturers could design a good reliable simple engine that was clean, all we get are engines, now with the "green" 3 cylinders and lots of turbo charging, without having any thing personally to base my knowledge on, I'd still reckon that it will be the turbos that go first.
Surely there is still a place for a 1.6 NA 8V engine giving 120PS that is clean, reliable and can pull well at low revs, tolerate some short journey use and still give good MPG and flexible all through its rev range.
I'm a bit like you, I would like to think that all my cars can be "keepers" - previous 2.8V6 Passat was as was 1.4 16V Polo, prior to that we had 2.0 16V GSI 4X4 Cav and 1.6 16V Fiesta - both these pairs of cars were run for roughly 10 years 100K miles, before that I ran Ford Orion 1.6 Ghia Injection(s) and before that a Ford Escort 1.6 Ghia - all these Ford CVH engines frightened me as they soon sounded like they would run out of life quickly, over that "Ford" period, wife ran a couple or so Fiesta 1.1L which had very reliable but noisy engines - ie simple runabouts.
Edit:- one thing that I am not too clear about is, why did VAG not just modify these 1.2 8V chain driven engines to resolve all the issues, instead they changed it to 16V, reversed the inlet and outlet manifolds and reverted to a belt driven camshaft!!