Page 2 of 5
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 7:33 pm
by metz
ah earth wire..i need to do that in the morning
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2004 3:38 am
by Krupa
- decat s/s exhaust system
- poloace chip
- extra cold air feeds to the airbox (does that count?)
- extra lambda earth to battery
Not much, but I'm planning on getting a new engine soon so that's all I've got planned for this one.
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2004 10:31 am
by tarquin bevilastard
g40 manifold and vag decat
k&n panel filter,
doing the cam as soon as i get some buckets
then i'll get a chip,and sort the rest of the exhaust
not after a lot of power gain
just enough to upset the local
chavalier boys
Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2005 8:45 pm
by nuttinnew
tarquin, what difference did you notice with the G exhaust fitted?
Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2005 9:08 pm
by tarquin bevilastard
not sure figure wise what difference it made
but it made it quicker than our other gt,
Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2005 9:11 pm
by nuttinnew
Not worried figure wise, more interested in seat-of-the-pants. Did it seem to make it better top end or all over?
Sorry for all the questions, just wondering if I can be bothered to fit mine when it'll have to come off when the car's sold...
Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2005 9:31 pm
by tarquin bevilastard
it's made it quicker getting into the red
i've hit the rev limiter in 4th still tryin to hit it in 5th
Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2005 9:32 pm
by metz
oh yea forgot..i have a g40 inlet manifold too.
Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2005 9:35 pm
by tarquin bevilastard
metz wrote:oh yea forgot..i have a g40 inlet manifold too.
if you've got the gt lump in you really need to lose that n get a gt 1
Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2005 9:42 pm
by nuttinnew
Guess I'll be getting dirty tomorrow then....
Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2005 10:45 pm
by metz
tarquin bevilastard wrote:metz wrote:oh yea forgot..i have a g40 inlet manifold too.
if you've got the gt lump in you really need to lose that n get a gt 1
really? theres sh*t loads of torque though.
Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2005 11:04 pm
by nuttinnew
Be interesting to see the graphs at the rr day
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 12:05 am
by Gareth_GT_Hatch
Yeah you should get more low down torque. Nev you're brother-in-law whom we all know so well actually wanted a g40 manifold for a GT conversion. (he was looking at buying my engine before metz bought it) As the person he was going to do it for was interested in midrange rather than top end performance.
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 12:47 am
by bstardchild
metz wrote:tarquin bevilastard wrote:metz wrote:oh yea forgot..i have a g40 inlet manifold too.
if you've got the gt lump in you really need to lose that n get a gt 1
really? theres sh*t loads of torque though.
Force fed induction doesn't need to be very clever.......
Basically anything will do on a G40 cos teh blower will mae up for any shortcomings in gas flow
Normally aspirated engines - I'd go with whatever was fitted std in the absence of throttle bodies
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 12:59 am
by Gareth_GT_Hatch
well what happened was I sold the manifold separately to the rest of the engine as the GT manifold alone is worth £50 to a G40 owner whereas the NZ/G40 manifold is worth about a tenner.
I dont think it matters all that much at the end of the day, unless you want to go mad with tuning the thing; cams, headwork etc.
theres a guy who lives near me called neil chatergee, he's got a GT conversion (originally a 1.3 genesis) and his cars got a g40 inlet manifold and an 8P box. last time it was on the rollers it got the same as hardhitters GT with similar mods. (Exhaust, chip and induction kit) obviously these componets do vary a bit but if we ignore that fact (becase its easier for me to ignore it
) then the difference made by not having a gt manifold on a mildly tuned engine is marginal.
like nuttinew said, be interesting to see what it gets on the rollers. you got any mods planned for it by then metz?
Mark hunters got a good photograph of 2 simultaineous rolling road printouts on his G40. One with a G40 manifold and the other with a GT one. The difference is quite a beneficial one. I'll try and find it.