UK-POLOS.NET - THE VW Polo Forum

M6TT F wrote:modern hondas are old mans' cars - which is probably why samuel has one, from reading his posts he's either 90 years old, or a young fogey who enjoys nothing better than to sit down infront of his TV watching Heartbeat with a a nice blanket on his knee and a steaming horlicks in his hand

Seriously Sammy boy, your limp wristed rants are tedious and hold no truth. Mods, please ban this idjeet!


ahhh - found sammy's pic in his profile - explains everything

samuel090180 wrote:

hot_polo wrote:

samuel090180 wrote: hondas claim that the 1.8 engine is as economical as a 1.4 when driven normally but this is hard to achieve....the manufacturers mpg figure is 41 miles to the gallon...but i am only managing 31.8...

second point the new civic is better built than the 1999-2001 polo...as a matter of fact it is better built than the current r32/gti...and i should know as my cousin is a vw sales executive...and has his pick of any vw model that he wants...

thirdly my 1.8 is much quicker than the 1999-2001 gti...it can pretty much own most vehicles at the traffic lights...

PMSL!! get back to earth boy.
own most vehicles at the lights, are you having a giraffe??? from all the sites i have checked the 0-60 is around 8.3 - big deal hardly anything to boast about. I have had quick cars over the last few years, s3, r32 to name a few and your car is hardly anything to write home about.

by the way, your big 1.8 is pumping out 138 bhp, i think you will find that it isnt that much quicker than a gti.

i have also travelled in quick cars...and i am not refering to relics such as the previous r32...or some out dated s3...

so i know what i am on about when i say that the civic is fast...