first the more important (?)
driving around the broadmarsh "island" thing (bus station), train station and all to the left, there's lots of police presence...... several of them with big-ass assualt and/or semi automatic rifles. What in the f*** was going on???? heard nowt on the news..
secondly - what's going on with the A610. it's got SPECS all along it for a start (fair enough, the 30/40 limits seem reasonably appropriate for most of the time) .... then when you're a mile or two either side of the M1... what WAS a perfectly good stretch of NSL-70 dual carriageway is now FORTY MILES PER HOUR (and then, fifty, a little further out of town where it's even MORE rural). What gives?
No cameras in evidence - yet - and so the local populace plus myself showed their utter contempt for this cynical measure by going 70-plus. (I stuck to 75 and overtook NO-ONE but got passed by about 20 vehicles of all types). Has any reason been published for this, because i feel like getting nuclear on the council. It doesnt really affect me as I only cruise up there when bored on block weeks, but solidarity and making a point, you know?
I looked my hardest for any reason for this limit, but it's probably some nonsense to do with the peak traffic levels - where vehicle speed is a self regulating thing regardless of limits anyway.
oh....... and i had a nice chat with the mobile speed van guys (well it was nice by the end and we shook hands, once tempers had settled) in West Bridgford - keep your eyes very peeled for camera signs posted up around the place, and if you dont see one within a mile of these two folks (names witheld - for now), pull up and ask them, more politely than i did, why they're parked up (on the public grass
Particularly why there's no sign on the camera side of the van, indeed it looks like there was one and it was removed. Forgot to point that out.
After the chat i had, i'm not sure whether to be on that chap's side or not, but i have a feeling some figures research will stick me back on the motorist side. He tried to use "lower speeds during the fuel crisis" (in the nineteen bloody seventies!) as a reason for less road deaths. Ya.. because slowing down from 30 uses so much less fuel (more, in some cases), even in an underdrive geared car.... and of course the fact that many people could no longer afford to drive -at all- and the existence of the three day week had nothing to do with it then....?