Road Charging - opinions??
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2003 11:03 pm
OK, so we've all seen the news today about the motorway network. Just watching the debate on Newsnight, and getting very confused by the glaring hole in our friend Alistair "scary eyebrows" Darling's argument.
New roads are, in thereself good news (well not for the value of my house, but that's another story) -- but what is your opinion of the road charging aspect.
Here's my take - Livingstone's London experiment is being held up as the example (no suprises there, then) - citing a 20% reduction in traffic after congestion was introduced. However, that's because there was a viable public service alternative -- tube and bus. Plus the ability of car users to find other modes of transport - scooters and bikes (you wouldn't believe how full the m/c parking bays are in central London now). However, the number of journeys being made has not reduced.
I ask - how could this outcome of charging possibly be replicated in inter-city travelling. The journeys still have to be made, and people simply will not use trains to any greater extent than they already are. Trains are already running way over capacity, with no sign of any improvement. Air travel is an affordable alterantive - but not for spontaneous journeys or journeys made btwn places not near airports. Plus if you add the cost of the taxi either end (which will increase with road charging) the affordability of air starts to dissappear.
So, surely congestion charging will just turn into another tax - with no affect on traffic growth - simply because there's no viable alternative. Imposing yet more tax will not remove these journeys. The price elasticity of demand for personal car use is absolutely huge.
Let's not even think about the potential that a GPS charging system would have for imposing speed limits _everywhere_ - not to mention the privacy concerns.
Think about the M6 relief road - everyone will use that because of the improvement to journeys it will make - the toll will just act as a tax and won't stem growth in journey numbers in any way. Besides although this is also being cited as a way of charging for raods, it was never implemented to contol journey numbers, it was simply to provide the revenue part of the PFI scheme.
I'd be interested in what guys think of this situation.
Deek.
(I get annoyed when people make illogical arguments... Grrrr....
)
>>Edited 10/07/03 for grammar.
New roads are, in thereself good news (well not for the value of my house, but that's another story) -- but what is your opinion of the road charging aspect.
Here's my take - Livingstone's London experiment is being held up as the example (no suprises there, then) - citing a 20% reduction in traffic after congestion was introduced. However, that's because there was a viable public service alternative -- tube and bus. Plus the ability of car users to find other modes of transport - scooters and bikes (you wouldn't believe how full the m/c parking bays are in central London now). However, the number of journeys being made has not reduced.
I ask - how could this outcome of charging possibly be replicated in inter-city travelling. The journeys still have to be made, and people simply will not use trains to any greater extent than they already are. Trains are already running way over capacity, with no sign of any improvement. Air travel is an affordable alterantive - but not for spontaneous journeys or journeys made btwn places not near airports. Plus if you add the cost of the taxi either end (which will increase with road charging) the affordability of air starts to dissappear.
So, surely congestion charging will just turn into another tax - with no affect on traffic growth - simply because there's no viable alternative. Imposing yet more tax will not remove these journeys. The price elasticity of demand for personal car use is absolutely huge.
Let's not even think about the potential that a GPS charging system would have for imposing speed limits _everywhere_ - not to mention the privacy concerns.
Think about the M6 relief road - everyone will use that because of the improvement to journeys it will make - the toll will just act as a tax and won't stem growth in journey numbers in any way. Besides although this is also being cited as a way of charging for raods, it was never implemented to contol journey numbers, it was simply to provide the revenue part of the PFI scheme.
I'd be interested in what guys think of this situation.
Deek.
(I get annoyed when people make illogical arguments... Grrrr....
>>Edited 10/07/03 for grammar.