Haven't you heard how much trouble Clarkson has had with his, he said the other day he doesn't think he's managed to complete a journey there and back yet.M6TT F wrote:there's only the GT i'd even consider owning if I had the money!
Nice car, shame about its reliability..................
-
ModifiedMadness
- Sponsor
- Posts: 6769
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 8:38 pm
- Location: Bedford Drives: MK5 Golf R32
-
samuel090180
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:25 am
I think the word that you are trying to find is 'perceived' and not 'beleived'......lolM6TT F wrote:samuel090180 wrote:M6TT F wrote:
are you two related? or are you in a relationshipbrown love in the room.....
"just look how many people are elling their gtis"
what do you expect - you're viewing a polo specific forum, therefore, you're unlikely to see ads for other cars. Go and look at the Civic Type R forum, the Cupra R forum, funnily enough there's plent of cars for sale
The other manufacturers have caught up, but i've driven quite a few, and most of them are souless. I wouldnt have anything french as the build quality is poop. Fords aint my bag, there's only the GT i'd even consider owning if I had the money! the rest are butt ugly. Build is good, ride is good, but they're 10 a penny...
italian cars - great cars to drive, not too badly built but **** residuals... the new Alfa is stunning.... but you'd want someone else to take the hit for the first 3 yrs!
this arguement is boring now, Samuel - you have a small cock, go and play with it in your shiny puma
You have shown in this 'statement' that you are very immature......'grow up'.
- oh dear, you cant even see the irony in my post - your 'beleived' IQ and your actual IQ are opposite ends of the scale.
go play on the road little boy
I think you'll find it's what you ' beleive' and what others 'perceive'samuel090180 wrote:I think the word that you are trying to find is 'perceived' and not 'beleived'......lolM6TT F wrote:samuel090180 wrote:
You have shown in this 'statement' that you are very immature......'grow up'.
- oh dear, you cant even see the irony in my post - your 'beleived' IQ and your actual IQ are opposite ends of the scale.
go play on the road little boy
-
samuel090180
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:25 am
You are becoming tiresome now........wasnt it you that said that this thread was ****.....so please stop contributing to it....okM6TT F wrote:I think you'll find it's what you ' beleive' and what others 'perceive'samuel090180 wrote:I think the word that you are trying to find is 'perceived' and not 'beleived'......lolM6TT F wrote:
- oh dear, you cant even see the irony in my post - your 'beleived' IQ and your actual IQ are opposite ends of the scale.
go play on the road little boy
-
smash_it_up_666
- Silver Member
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 10:43 pm
- Location: Cumbria
-
mysteryboy
- Bling Bling Diamond Member
- Posts: 2673
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 11:46 pm
- Location: London Drives: MK4 8V Hates: Speed Bumps
- Contact:
samuel090180 wrote:You are becoming tiresome now........wasnt it you that said that this thread was ****.....so please stop contributing to it....okM6TT F wrote:I think you'll find it's what you ' beleive' and what others 'perceive'samuel090180 wrote: I think the word that you are trying to find is 'perceived' and not 'beleived'......lol
classic 'retraction of statement' there sammyboy - at least be man enough to admit your failings. - your mum would be so proud (or were you the product of a lab experiment?
-
samuel090180
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:25 am
I have clearly won this arguement due to the fact that I have conducted myself in an Eloquent manner and I have not 'reverted' to childish 'name calling'.....I am therefore going to 'sit' back and 'view' your comments...........lolsmash_it_up_666 wrote:no it was me who said it was **** actually.
and your the tiresome one here mate
-
smash_it_up_666
- Silver Member
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 10:43 pm
- Location: Cumbria
samuel090180 wrote:I have clearly won this arguement due to the fact that I have conducted myself in an Eloquent manner and I have not 'reverted' to childish 'name calling'.....I am therefore going to 'sit' back and 'view' your comments...........lolsmash_it_up_666 wrote:no it was me who said it was **** actually.
and your the tiresome one here mate
you mean your pointless arguement has run it's course, and the ''childrens big book of words'' has come to its last page. I sincerely hope you're a good looking chap, coz you're dull as fcuk to chat to!
-
smash_it_up_666
- Silver Member
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 10:43 pm
- Location: Cumbria
-
olop_chris
- Sponsor
- Posts: 2131
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 11:15 pm
- Location: Derbyshire Drives: 270bhp .:R32
- Contact:
-
smash_it_up_666
- Silver Member
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 10:43 pm
- Location: Cumbria