What about the clio 182?
-
97polo_16v
- New
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 4:30 pm
- Location: Bridgwater
-
ModifiedMadness
- Sponsor
- Posts: 6769
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 8:38 pm
- Location: Bedford Drives: MK5 Golf R32
Seconded, if you couldn't afford the GTi insurance then surely the 182 will be either of a similar amount or more.dino wrote:If insurance is high on the Polo GTI I'd imagine it will be high on a Clio 182!!!
You should check the insurance first and either pay the high cost because it's the car you want or get a car that isn't going to cost a massive amount to insure.
My girlfriend has a 53-plate 172 Cup
safe to say its fast, handles really well and you get a massive amount more feedback when you're driving it compared to the Polo GTi. The steering is nicely weighted up and the way it tackles corners is awesome, and thats with no modifications whatsoever
OK so the build quality *might* not be up there with VW, the interior feels plasticky and its very (read: VERY) light when compared directly to the Polo - your average crosswind is very easily felt - but its bloody great to drive
On the downside its a thirsty wee beast if you drive it how it should be!!
Go for a Cup car and you won't be disappointed. I was looking a few months back at the 182 Trophy, there are some nice standard examples out there for easily under £10,000...
Cheers
OK so the build quality *might* not be up there with VW, the interior feels plasticky and its very (read: VERY) light when compared directly to the Polo - your average crosswind is very easily felt - but its bloody great to drive
On the downside its a thirsty wee beast if you drive it how it should be!!
Go for a Cup car and you won't be disappointed. I was looking a few months back at the 182 Trophy, there are some nice standard examples out there for easily under £10,000...
Cheers
-
david burton
- Bling Bling Diamond Member
- Posts: 3082
- Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2003 2:31 pm
- Location: Reading
- Contact:
I think I'm thinking of the 2005 Clio then rather than the 2003. But a quick look shows both have 4 star ratings.Mouse_GTI wrote:I thought the Mk2 Clio got a 3 star NCAP rating and the Mk5 Polo a 4 star NCAP?david burton wrote:One thing to note is that the clio is far better rated for safety than the polo
-
shantybeater
- Bling Bling Diamond Member
- Posts: 2149
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 12:24 pm
- Location: Bournemouth Drives: 6n2 TDi
- alexperkins
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14873
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 5:29 pm
- Drives: 91 Golf GTI, 01 TT 225, 54 T5 174
- Location: Poole, Dorset, UK.
- Contact:
If i save hard enough itll be possible. I merely just wanted some input into what people think of them.
The way it looks is ill stay VW for a bit...maybe move up to a 1.6 sport or a TDI.
The current look is at a TDI as i do so many miles each week just all over the place - cheaper for me in the long run
The way it looks is ill stay VW for a bit...maybe move up to a 1.6 sport or a TDI.
The current look is at a TDI as i do so many miles each week just all over the place - cheaper for me in the long run
I went from a 172 to the Polo Gti, the polo is much better built than a clio, i've had far less problems, there's lots to go wrong with the clio's, particularly engine management sensors etc. thought having said that the clio was alot of fun when it ran smoothly, but she does like the petrol station too.
If you want a fun car, thats quick but that can be very temperamental and isnt made as well as a VW go with the 182, but personally i'd never own another as an early day car, they go wrong far too often for my liking.
Gemma
If you want a fun car, thats quick but that can be very temperamental and isnt made as well as a VW go with the 182, but personally i'd never own another as an early day car, they go wrong far too often for my liking.
Gemma

