In Need of a new clutch

Chat about your MKV (6N2) Polo GTi
Post Reply
DaveHew
Getting There!
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:02 pm
Location: West London

In Need of a new clutch

Post by DaveHew »

Clutch is going and is killing my gearbox *crunch!*
any ideas where i can get a decent clutch from and prices etc.
any help would be appreicated. thanks!
dave
User avatar
Tim_GTi
Post Whore
Posts: 12289
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:31 pm
Location: Newport, South Wales
Contact:

Re: In Need of a new clutch

Post by Tim_GTi »

Yep, get a SACHS clutch kit, GSF can get hold of them for around £86. They don't stock them but can order straight from SACHS.

Part number - 3000 581 001

VW will charge you double that for a factory reconned clutch. Which although is decent enough, it's twice the price, you need to exchange your old one, and the SACHS is smoother 8)

Don't let a garage source you one, as they're likely to pick up a bunk cheap kit which will be just as bad as your current one. Just speaking from my own experiences.
kinder
Bronze Member
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 7:24 pm
Contact:

Re: In Need of a new clutch

Post by kinder »

a sachs is the best for them i got mine form gsf and there are really cheap if you cant do it your self or dont have the time like i dint then mr clutch done mine while i was at work
NFS
Silver Member
Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 9:33 pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: In Need of a new clutch

Post by NFS »

Ive just bought a a LUK clutch from GSF, are they any good? Or am i better of returning it and getting a SACHS clutch?
User avatar
Tim_GTi
Post Whore
Posts: 12289
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:31 pm
Location: Newport, South Wales
Contact:

Re: In Need of a new clutch

Post by Tim_GTi »

NFS wrote:Ive just bought a a LUK clutch from GSF, are they any good? Or am i better of returning it and getting a SACHS clutch?
LUK are classed as OEM replacements, very decent kits as far as I'm aware. I wouldn't bother returning it though unless the price margin is considerably different, i.e much more than £86
Post Reply