I have just edited my earlier post with some big red text pointing out my mistake on the data points.
I did a comparative run today in the silver car, here are the results
The Vagcom description for measuring block 093, sector 3 says that it measures "Phase position Bank 1" with two footnotes [1] [2]
[1] Deviation from correct position (shift of camshaft position sensor on shaft), 0 = Position OK
[2] The phase position is displayed only when the phase adaptation was successfully concluded
The data log shows the following
---------------------------- Silver Car ------------------------------ Black car --------
Idle------------------ 1.9-2.2 degrees BTDC --------------- 3.3-5.2 degrees ATDC
Full Throttle-------- 1.9-2.2 degrees BTDC --------------- 3.3-4.4 degrees ATDC
Range--------------- 1.9-3.0 degrees BTDC --------------- 3.3-5.2 degrees ATDC
The spec according for the same measuring block in Elaswin is 1.0 degrees BTDC to 8 degrees ATDC
However, based in this thread
http://audisrs.com/ftopic21169-0-asc-0.php it seems that vagcom is measuring a deviation from the ideal/programmed position whereas Elsawin talks about the actual camshaft adjustment
So, it seems that the cam timing between the two cars is 5.4-8.2 degrees different to each other. If the correct VAG-com value is zero (from the audi thread / Ross-tech), then it would seem that the silver car is closer to spec than the black one. If the Elsawin approach is correct then the black car is bank on the centre of the range and the silver car is out of the range.
Is there anyone who knows the VW and Rosstech software sufficiently well to confirm which view is correct, or alternatively access to both bits of kit to do a back to back comparison ??