215-40-18 or 225-40-18 tyres on Polo GTI
-
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2018 2:59 pm
- Drives: Polo GTi+ on order
- Location: Midlands
Re: 215-40-18 or 225-40-18 tyres on Polo GTI
When I get my car and change to 225/40/18 tyres I’ll have 4 spare tyres. My wife’s mk3 Seat Leon 1.4 FR is currently on 225/40/18 tyres and buy the time my car comes her tyres will be due a change. It may be a dim question but for reassurance I’m assuming I can put the spare 215/40/18 tyres from the Polo on to her car as she isn’t a performance driver?
-
- Bling Bling Diamond Member
- Posts: 2643
- Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2018 9:58 pm
- Drives: Audi A4 Avant Quattro 40 TDI, Polo GTI+
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Re: 215-40-18 or 225-40-18 tyres on Polo GTI
I'd assume that if the Leon FR has 225/40 R18 tyres, the 18" wheels will be 7.5J width (you'll need to check), so they'd be fine. However, she'll not thank you for the Bridgestones, they'll make the ride a bit knobbly, the tyre roar will increase and plenty of tramping if she's more than a little enthusiastic in moving from a standstill. The grip is pretty poor too. I'd get them off immediately, ebay them and recoup most of the PS4 spend.Ima wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 8:11 pm When I get my car and change to 225/40/18 tyres I’ll have 4 spare tyres. My wife’s mk3 Seat Leon 1.4 FR is currently on 225/40/18 tyres and buy the time my car comes her tyres will be due a change. It may be a dim question but for reassurance I’m assuming I can put the spare 215/40/18 tyres from the Polo on to her car as she isn’t a performance driver?
If you do put the Brudgestones on the Leon, you'll probably need to increase the Leon's tyre pressure recommendations to those of the Polo. Conversely, if you put 225/40 R18s on to the Polo, you'll want to drop the tyre pressures a little. 36psi on the fronts and 33psi on the rears work well for me.
-
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2018 2:59 pm
- Drives: Polo GTi+ on order
- Location: Midlands
Re: 215-40-18 or 225-40-18 tyres on Polo GTI
Thanks monkeyhanger. That’s really helpful thank you. Her car has Bridgestone Potenzas S001 on it already as original fitment tyres and they are pretty rough tyres but she hasn’t noticed. Do you think think the Polo tyres in the 215/40 will be even worse or about the same? If worse I’ll cut my losses and sell the Polo tyres on.
-
- Bling Bling Diamond Member
- Posts: 2643
- Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2018 9:58 pm
- Drives: Audi A4 Avant Quattro 40 TDI, Polo GTI+
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Re: 215-40-18 or 225-40-18 tyres on Polo GTI
They're about the same, maybe a little worse. I've had Potenza S001 on a MK5 Golf GT TDI170 and a MK7 Golf GTD. My R came on Bridgestone Potenza RE050A tyres which were every bit as bad. Under moderate acceleration with my first Polo GTI+, the back end got away from me exiting a large roundabout, as a GTD sailed past me in the outside lane with no drama. That was the trigger to change to PS4s. When the wife's GTI+ came, I didn't wait to change them, they went on day 1.Ima wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 10:52 pm Thanks monkeyhanger. That’s really helpful thank you. Her car has Bridgestone Potenzas S001 on it already as original fitment tyres and they are pretty rough tyres but she hasn’t noticed. Do you think think the Polo tyres in the 215/40 will be even worse or about the same? If worse I’ll cut my losses and sell the Polo tyres on.
-
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2018 2:59 pm
- Drives: Polo GTi+ on order
- Location: Midlands
Re: 215-40-18 or 225-40-18 tyres on Polo GTI
Thanks, so likely best to get rid and have done. I don’t want her car to be worse than it is. I had the same tyres on my Leon 1.8 and found them awful, noisy with terrible grip. I put Goodyear’s eagle f1 asymetrics on and that transformed the car.
-
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2019 10:30 am
- Drives: 2019 Polo GTI
- Location: South Africa
Re: 215-40-18 or 225-40-18 tyres on Polo GTI
On the Michelin Pilot Sport 4..Grip and steering feel is awesome but Some Reviewers say their fuel consumption has increased by 10% to 15%? Interesting
-
- Bling Bling Diamond Member
- Posts: 3555
- Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 9:40 pm
- Drives: 2020 AW Polo GTI+, Pure White.
- Location: UK
Re: 215-40-18 or 225-40-18 tyres on Polo GTI
It’s one of the trade-offs of swapping the GTI/GTI+ Bridgestone Turanzas - which are a ‘hard as nails’ tyre like with poor grip and low rolling resistance - for one with much better grip and higher rolling resistance like Michelin’s PS4. A stickier tyre like the PS4 won’t roll as freely over the road surface, which will have a negative impact on fuel consumption compared to the Turanzas - borne out by the official fuel consumption ratings; Bridgestone Turanza T005 is ‘B’ whereas the Michelin PS4 is ‘E’. However, as you’ve said, steering feel and grip are much improved with the PS4 compared to the Turanza.green justin wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 5:47 pm On the Michelin Pilot Sport 4..Grip and steering feel is awesome but Some Reviewers say their fuel consumption has increased by 10% to 15%? Interesting
Bridgestone Turanza T005 = low wear rate, poor grip, fuel economy benefits, Michelin PS4 = (probably) higher wear rate but superior grip and handling, and poorer fuel economy. At the end of the day, it comes down to personal choice and what individuals consider to be the most important factors when choosing tyres for a performance car. IMO the Polo GTI / GTI+ does deserve better tyres than Bridgestone Turanza T005.
I dare say that VW will have fitted Bridgestones to the 18” Brescia alloys, inflated to VW’s maximum recommended pressure for WLTP purposes when testing the 18” wheel option, as it would have helped optimise the official figures; maximise fuel consumption and minimise the emissions figures.
-
- Bling Bling Diamond Member
- Posts: 2643
- Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2018 9:58 pm
- Drives: Audi A4 Avant Quattro 40 TDI, Polo GTI+
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Re: 215-40-18 or 225-40-18 tyres on Polo GTI
I don't read that much into official tyre fuel ratings. Sometimes the other ratings aren't that predictable either. The Potenza RE050 fitted to my Golf R had an A rating for grip, but they were awful. I doubt there's 10% difference in mpg between the best and the worst either.SRGTD wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 6:35 pmIt’s one of the trade-offs of swapping the GTI/GTI+ Bridgestone Turanzas - which are a ‘hard as nails’ tyre like with poor grip and low rolling resistance - for one with much better grip and higher rolling resistance like Michelin’s PS4. A stickier tyre like the PS4 won’t roll as freely over the road surface, which will have a negative impact on fuel consumption compared to the Turanzas - borne out by the official fuel consumption ratings; Bridgestone Turanza T005 is ‘B’ whereas the Michelin PS4 is ‘E’. However, as you’ve said, steering feel and grip are much improved with the PS4 compared to the Turanza.green justin wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 5:47 pm On the Michelin Pilot Sport 4..Grip and steering feel is awesome but Some Reviewers say their fuel consumption has increased by 10% to 15%? Interesting
Bridgestone Turanza T005 = low wear rate, poor grip, fuel economy benefits, Michelin PS4 = (probably) higher wear rate but superior grip and handling, and poorer fuel economy. At the end of the day, it comes down to personal choice and what individuals consider to be the most important factors when choosing tyres for a performance car. IMO the Polo GTI / GTI+ does deserve better tyres than Bridgestone Turanza T005.
I dare say that VW will have fitted Bridgestones to the 18” Brescia alloys, inflated to VW’s maximum recommended pressure for WLTP purposes when testing the 18” wheel option, as it would have helped optimise the official figures; maximise fuel consumption and minimise the emissions figures.
My swap to Michelins has had no detrimental measurable effect on mpg, nor has it previously with 2 MK5 Golfs and 2 MK7 Golfs that I was unlucky enough to get Bridgestones with. This is especially important to emphasise on the Polo with the tyre width increasing by 4.7% vs the standard 215s and the tyre pressure decreasing from 41psi on the fronts (215/40 R18) to 36psi (225/40 R18). On the Golfs it was a 100% like for like swap.
The Michelins might have a bit more rolling resistance, but they've got far better grip, which means that more of the power generated by the car is transferred to moving the car forward - which is going to benefit mpg. A tyre with poor grip (like the Bridgestones) is going to be wasting more kinetic energy at the wheels if they can't put all of it down.
I'm guessing that when the official figures are derived for a car, they have to do them from one tyre type that a fleet of cars used to create a pool of data uses, otherwise you'd pick the grippy tyres to do the performance figures and some ultra low rolling resistance ones to bring your fuel economy figures up. I'd estimate 0.3 to 0.5 seconds between true 0-62 times for a GTI+ with Bridgestones and PS4/Conti5/Goodyear Eagle Asy3 or 5. With the slightly warmer weather I can floor my GTI+ from a standstill and get zero tramping (brief flicker of the traction control light only).
Bridgestones aren't universally used on Brescia shod Polos, different markets get different tyres. It seems to be the RHD cars that get them. Same story on the Golf, you don't get the Germans, French and central/Eastern Europeans saddled with Bridgestone Potenzas on their GTDs, GTIs and Rs.
It'll almost certainly be down to cost. VWUK will specify what tyres they want fitting to VW GmbH when deciding on car spec for the UK market.
Most of the other big brands are far better than the Bridgestone, but for me Michelins are the best all rounders. Other tyres might pip them to top spot in a
category each, but they usually win out overall.
I don't know how they do it but somehow they manage to make tyres that are grippy in warm and cold conditions relatively quiet, comfortable, good on mpg and yet still decent on the wear rate.
-
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2019 10:50 am
- Drives: GTi++/TT/TDi/190E
- Location: Vdbp.
Re: 215-40-18 or 225-40-18 tyres on Polo GTI
Just got mine....
Hoping for some improvement
Hoping for some improvement
-
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2019 10:30 am
- Drives: 2019 Polo GTI
- Location: South Africa
-
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2019 10:30 am
- Drives: 2019 Polo GTI
- Location: South Africa
Re: 215-40-18 or 225-40-18 tyres on Polo GTI
I have to ask...SRGTD wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 6:35 pmIt’s one of the trade-offs of swapping the GTI/GTI+ Bridgestone Turanzas - which are a ‘hard as nails’ tyre like with poor grip and low rolling resistance - for one with much better grip and higher rolling resistance like Michelin’s PS4. A stickier tyre like the PS4 won’t roll as freely over the road surface, which will have a negative impact on fuel consumption compared to the Turanzas - borne out by the official fuel consumption ratings; Bridgestone Turanza T005 is ‘B’ whereas the Michelin PS4 is ‘E’. However, as you’ve said, steering feel and grip are much improved with the PS4 compared to the Turanza.green justin wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 5:47 pm On the Michelin Pilot Sport 4..Grip and steering feel is awesome but Some Reviewers say their fuel consumption has increased by 10% to 15%? Interesting
Bridgestone Turanza T005 = low wear rate, poor grip, fuel economy benefits, Michelin PS4 = (probably) higher wear rate but superior grip and handling, and poorer fuel economy. At the end of the day, it comes down to personal choice and what individuals consider to be the most important factors when choosing tyres for a performance car. IMO the Polo GTI / GTI+ does deserve better tyres than Bridgestone Turanza T005.
I dare say that VW will have fitted Bridgestones to the 18” Brescia alloys, inflated to VW’s maximum recommended pressure for WLTP purposes when testing the 18” wheel option, as it would have helped optimise the official figures; maximise fuel consumption and minimise the emissions figures.
I get an average +- 420km per tank , would I get similar figures if I have PS4 fitted following the same daily routes to work and back.
-
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2019 10:50 am
- Drives: GTi++/TT/TDi/190E
- Location: Vdbp.
Re: 215-40-18 or 225-40-18 tyres on Polo GTI
I actually had the Bridgestone Turanza T001 on my GTi and that seems to have identical rating of C and A as the Michelin PS4 with the Turanza 1 dB noisier...SRGTD wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 6:35 pm
It’s one of the trade-offs of swapping the GTI/GTI+ Bridgestone Turanzas - which are a ‘hard as nails’ tyre like with poor grip and low rolling resistance - for one with much better grip and higher rolling resistance like Michelin’s PS4. A stickier tyre like the PS4 won’t roll as freely over the road surface, which will have a negative impact on fuel consumption compared to the Turanzas - borne out by the official fuel consumption ratings; Bridgestone Turanza T005 is ‘B’ whereas the Michelin PS4 is ‘E’. However, as you’ve said, steering feel and grip are much improved with the PS4 compared to the Turanza.
Then again... it's all lab results
-
- Bling Bling Diamond Member
- Posts: 2643
- Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2018 9:58 pm
- Drives: Audi A4 Avant Quattro 40 TDI, Polo GTI+
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Re: 215-40-18 or 225-40-18 tyres on Polo GTI
Let's be clear on that "420km per tank" - do you always get that, or just since the roads are empty due to Covid-19 lockdown?green justin wrote: ↑Mon May 11, 2020 9:36 pm
I have to ask...
I get an average +- 420km per tank , would I get similar figures if I have PS4 fitted following the same daily routes to work and back.
420km = 262 miles, if you're taking it down to an indicated "0 miles/0 km then that's the UK equivalent of 30mpg. I was averaging 34mpg on my 13 mile commute on mixed road pre-lockdown and I was getting no better than that on the Bridgestones.
-
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2019 10:30 am
- Drives: 2019 Polo GTI
- Location: South Africa
Re: 215-40-18 or 225-40-18 tyres on Polo GTI
Before LockDown, I would get those figures. Between 400km to 420km then the light goes on.monkeyhanger wrote: ↑Mon May 11, 2020 10:29 pmLet's be clear on that "420km per tank" - do you always get that, or just since the roads are empty due to Covid-19 lockdown?green justin wrote: ↑Mon May 11, 2020 9:36 pm
I have to ask...
I get an average +- 420km per tank , would I get similar figures if I have PS4 fitted following the same daily routes to work and back.
420km = 262 miles, if you're taking it down to an indicated "0 miles/0 km then that's the UK equivalent of 30mpg. I was averaging 34mpg on my 13 mile commute on mixed road pre-lockdown and I was getting no better than that on the Bridgestones.
Mostly Back Roads with stop and go. Sometimes Sport Mode.
-
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2019 10:30 am
- Drives: 2019 Polo GTI
- Location: South Africa
Re: 215-40-18 or 225-40-18 tyres on Polo GTI
From tyre reviews, the labels are mid-leadingfazzy wrote: ↑Mon May 11, 2020 9:54 pmI actually had the Bridgestone Turanza T001 on my GTi and that seems to have identical rating of C and A as the Michelin PS4 with the Turanza 1 dB noisier...SRGTD wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 6:35 pm
It’s one of the trade-offs of swapping the GTI/GTI+ Bridgestone Turanzas - which are a ‘hard as nails’ tyre like with poor grip and low rolling resistance - for one with much better grip and higher rolling resistance like Michelin’s PS4. A stickier tyre like the PS4 won’t roll as freely over the road surface, which will have a negative impact on fuel consumption compared to the Turanzas - borne out by the official fuel consumption ratings; Bridgestone Turanza T005 is ‘B’ whereas the Michelin PS4 is ‘E’. However, as you’ve said, steering feel and grip are much improved with the PS4 compared to the Turanza.
Then again... it's all lab results