Cheers
Multi valves/Multi cylinders
-
carmadaaron
- Bling Bling Diamond Member
- Posts: 4350
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 8:55 pm
- Location: Scotland
Multi valves/Multi cylinders
why do manufacturers tend to move to multi valves and multi cylinders nowadays? like BMW and Mercs....
Cheers
Cheers
-
david burton
- Bling Bling Diamond Member
- Posts: 3082
- Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2003 2:31 pm
- Location: Reading
- Contact:
- bstardchild
- Moderator
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 9:53 pm
- Location: Norfolk - "Its just Black & Dirty"
Re: Multi valves/Multi cylinders
Cos if they'd stayed with single cylinder lumps like dumper trucks thats the performance we would have nowcarmadaaron wrote:why do manufacturers tend to move to multi valves and multi cylinders nowadays? like BMW and Mercs....
Cheers
More cylinders = smoother power pulses
BMUU and Merc are into top end market so smooth is expected
- 4 cyl OK
- 6 cyl Smoother
- 8 Cyl V-smooth
- 12 Cyl Ultra Smooth
Multi Valve
Basically down to combustion chamber filling and weight
- 2 small valves flow more than 1 of eqvilient size
- more valves = lighter valve train and so less stress on the chain/belt - engine can rev higher and produce more power
Does that help
-
Tahrey1043
- Bling Bling Diamond Member
- Posts: 5184
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2003 1:15 am
- Location: Birmingham! Enjoys: The pseudo-G-Smiles provided by a 1.6 Megane Sport valver...
- Contact:
nah mate that simply means one injector per cylinder, mounted closer to the actual intake (rather than waaaaay up for singlepoint) for better responsiveness and control of fuel delivery. sort of like multi carbing it but less wasteful on fuel. your engine is still very likely a 8v.
BTW engines with a multiple of 6 are generally the smoothest for some reason - an 8 or a V8 will be smoother than a 4 of any kind, but still needs a balancer shaft and doesn't run so smooth as even a straight 6
agreed though - V12 = teh schmoovness.
i think it's just a case of "bigger is better" in marketing terms, and if only some dumb corporate f****r would do that with MPG again we might avert the winter oil crisis that's screaming from the pages of the metro (quality broadsheet i know!)
mind you thats all down to bloody americans driving tanks on their roads and tanks (and fighter jets) in other peoples countries. thats what, 5 miles to the gallon out of a combat tank when cruising, 10000lbs of aviation fuel used on a 2 hour sortie even in a (fairly slow, built to be extra efficient) F117A?
edit - wtf did i write "still likely 16v" for? dumkopf!
BTW engines with a multiple of 6 are generally the smoothest for some reason - an 8 or a V8 will be smoother than a 4 of any kind, but still needs a balancer shaft and doesn't run so smooth as even a straight 6
agreed though - V12 = teh schmoovness.
i think it's just a case of "bigger is better" in marketing terms, and if only some dumb corporate f****r would do that with MPG again we might avert the winter oil crisis that's screaming from the pages of the metro (quality broadsheet i know!)
mind you thats all down to bloody americans driving tanks on their roads and tanks (and fighter jets) in other peoples countries. thats what, 5 miles to the gallon out of a combat tank when cruising, 10000lbs of aviation fuel used on a 2 hour sortie even in a (fairly slow, built to be extra efficient) F117A?
edit - wtf did i write "still likely 16v" for? dumkopf!
Last edited by Tahrey1043 on Fri Oct 22, 2004 2:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
carmadaaron
- Bling Bling Diamond Member
- Posts: 4350
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 8:55 pm
- Location: Scotland
- bstardchild
- Moderator
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 9:53 pm
- Location: Norfolk - "Its just Black & Dirty"
Exhaust valves on a 24V 6 cyl 3.0 Vauxhall are £60 each plus vat (sodium filled to lighten and help with heat dissapation)carmadaaron wrote:r multivalves expensive?
Inlet valves on same are £8 each plus vat (not sodium filed)
- when the timing chain snaps (and it can after 150K) it does 12 x Exhaust and 12 x inlets
I've got plenty of bent ones spare
-
carmadaaron
- Bling Bling Diamond Member
- Posts: 4350
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 8:55 pm
- Location: Scotland
- bstardchild
- Moderator
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 9:53 pm
- Location: Norfolk - "Its just Black & Dirty"
Multi valve doesn't neccesarily make em better Nice Big block chevy only has 2 valves per cylinder (OK so it's got 8 cyl's) and can make seriously good bhpcarmadaaron wrote:so better engines have multivalves...... crappy manufacturers tend to have less valves....
Multivalves tend to make power at the top end of the rev range
2V or 3 V engines tend to be more torque in the mid range
Korean cars have multi valves
-
carmadaaron
- Bling Bling Diamond Member
- Posts: 4350
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 8:55 pm
- Location: Scotland
- bstardchild
- Moderator
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 9:53 pm
- Location: Norfolk - "Its just Black & Dirty"
-
david burton
- Bling Bling Diamond Member
- Posts: 3082
- Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2003 2:31 pm
- Location: Reading
- Contact:
- bstardchild
- Moderator
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 9:53 pm
- Location: Norfolk - "Its just Black & Dirty"
Depends of the firing orientation "IMHO" you can make a lumpy 8 like big block V8 (corvette) or a mega smooth 8 like the Ferrari I've just been round the block in - not that quick tho!!!!david burton wrote:i still don't get why they've suddenly started using the multi-valve phrase - surely it is more than just 4 valves per cylinder etc? that's been around for ages.
and a 6 cylinder engine is smoother than an 8 cylinder - the 6 cylinder is "perfectly balanced" in all modes, the 8 cyl is not
-
Karl_CLCoupe
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1131
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 11:43 am
- Location: Southport AKA: Mr Sambuca
- Contact: