135 bhp

Chat about your MKV (6N2) Polo GTi
Post Reply
moynas
Silver Member
Posts: 403
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:53 am
Location: colchester essex
Contact:

135 bhp

Post by moynas »

:D put the polo on a rolling road today and was very pleased with the outcome!

went up against a lupo gti which was stock that produced 130bhp then put the polo on with its bmc and exhaust and it produced 135 bhp with 120 lbs of torque! very pleased!
Nelson_Wilbury
Moderator
Posts: 1638
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 10:17 pm
Location: Suffolk

Post by Nelson_Wilbury »

Well done! :) Mine was too low for the rollers :cry: Said i'd have to rip my undertray off! No thanks...

Never got a chance to speak to you again! Saw your car as I came in but as soon as I got out of my car you'd gone! :lol:
discod
New
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 7:37 pm
Location: fife

Post by discod »

at last somebody will say what there car is putting out.i just wanted to find out to see if anyone was getting the same as me.my car is standard and is putting out 137bhp and 118lb/ft of torque
carmadaaron
Bling Bling Diamond Member
Posts: 4350
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Scotland

Post by carmadaaron »

how did the lupo manage 130?
Si_GTi
Moderator
Posts: 5020
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 1:14 pm
Location: Shropshire

Post by Si_GTi »

carmadaaron wrote:how did the lupo manage 130?
Its the same engine as the Polo GTi, so probably 130bhp as standard IIRC...
Musicfreek2002
Bronze Member
Posts: 138
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 1:09 pm

Post by Musicfreek2002 »

The Lupo has a 1.6 16v in it but it alse has shreik cams as standard thats y they are so rapid!
carmadaaron
Bling Bling Diamond Member
Posts: 4350
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Scotland

Post by carmadaaron »

but dont the 1.6 16v gti engine have 125bhp? instead of 130
JWC
Gold Member
Posts: 642
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 9:11 am
Location: Birmingham
Contact:

Post by JWC »

I think it would be intersting to stick mine on and see what it actually does produce. I bet it isn't what it is meant to be. Some days, she can't be bothered and other days she seems to go really well.
Si_GTi
Moderator
Posts: 5020
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 1:14 pm
Location: Shropshire

Post by Si_GTi »

carmadaaron wrote:but dont the 1.6 16v gti engine have 125bhp? instead of 130
Thats what VW tell you, yeah. But it's a bit like the jap-spec Imprezas, the Japanese law is that they are limited to 280bhp, so thats what Subaru claim, despite there being maybe closer to 300/310bhp in there :wink:
ttaw2
Bronze Member
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 10:10 pm
Location: Northampton

Post by ttaw2 »

Si_GTi wrote:
carmadaaron wrote:but dont the 1.6 16v gti engine have 125bhp? instead of 130
Thats what VW tell you, yeah. But it's a bit like the jap-spec Imprezas, the Japanese law is that they are limited to 280bhp, so thats what Subaru claim, despite there being maybe closer to 300/310bhp in there :wink:
Nothing in the law to say the polos got to be limited to 125 though :lol:

I think all manufacturers like to quote down a bit because of fluctuation in the output over all the cars produced...

At the moment I think I'd accept a reliable 110 brake! Mine was alternating between feeling 140 and 25 today :roll: sod shreik cams, I think mine has got shrek cams!!!

Do the shreiks make that much difference?
Post Reply