dubpolo wrote:poussou wrote:Hi everyone,
I have recently installed the Schrick cams to my Gti but as it seems they are EXTREME when compared to the originals
what do you mean by extreme? i was looking for some but you may of just put me off!
Well....Here's the deal...
My advice to you is DONT DO IT, if you are not prepared for some MAJOR changes to the engine along with it....
There has been an EXTENSIVE discussion in another (greek) forum about this tuning by me and we have dicovered that the actual cams are as i said "extreme" for the Gti.According to WinElsa the Gti's original cams are 205 int. / 215 exh. while the Schricks are 256 int./ 244 exh !!
This, along with th installation of a BMC CDA has made the car TOTALLY different in its behaviour.Also to mention the car IS CHIPPED (cause i couldn't really imagine what it would be like ifit wasnt)
There is a huge shift of torque to the higher rpm's which makes the driver having to keep it always above 3000 rpm (during acceleration ) just to get the car to be responsive.Stepping on the gas in 2 or higher gear instantaniously from idle, has NO EFFECT.The is a lag phenomenon which i can't only atributte to the E-GAS thing.
The reasons for this (as i have figured out after LOTS of hour of reading on how engines work) are or moght be the following.
The increased cam duration has changed the timing of the valves which makes 2 things happen
a)The so called "effective compression" is lower now, making low RPM torque obsolete
b)The current ECU programming isn't sufficient to deliver the right advance for the low RPMs hence the car "lags"
I haven't been able to discreminate between the above yet, since what is necessary is a)a cranking compression test and b)a dyno session to determine the A/F ratio and necessary advance.
I was ready (and still am) to take the car to a dyno tuner for it to be programed on the dyno, but then it occured to me that the best thing would be to settle the compression ration first and then rechip the car.I am at this stage now thinking of what i should do.
The solutions to the above problems are as follows..
1)Increase effective compression by
a)Skimming the head.(As far as i know noone has done that and can't really tell how the Gti head will react to that.It is known the compression is pretty high already but due to the high compression pistons.Don't know how far i can skim of it without it being dangerous...)
b)Changing the gasket to a thinner one (AFAIK the Gti has a competition gasket and don't know if i can get a thinner one...Maybe you guys can help me out...)
c)Installing adjustable cam gears, which would have the effect of timing the cams to open and close the valves quicker, in effect reducing the cams duration and thus shifting the torque curve to lower rpm's, losing some top power.
Having said all that, i do have to stress the car behaves AMAZINGLY above 3000+ RPMS.The acceleration with 2nd gear from 3000 to redline is UNBELIEVABLE

.It almost feels like the car is turboed !!!Power ahs shifted as i said and specially when the VVTi kicks in its hell.Engine sound has changed also with a racing sound in all the rev range.I guess it turned form a German one to a....Japanese ???
So as i said, if you are not prepaired for major changes (since i know most of you guys haven't even chipped that car) don't try it.They won;t work as direct bolt-ons.But if you do decide and the stuff along with it....IT GONNA BE ONE HELL OF A POWER GAIN

.
Sorry guys...I'm alone sailing in uncharted waters here...I learn as i go along....
P.S. @ Josh....The car as i said above has change completely.I do have to say it has given me LOTS OF SMILES as it is right now

Its just that you don't get the feeling of completedness if it doesn't behave fully as you want it to.I guess we can't have both (torque and power) in this N/A world.I am estimating it should be close to 145+ right now.But since i haven't dynoed it and seen ppl with Lupo's making 135+ stock, i can't really tell.A +15 hp difference from stock is a safe bet i guess....