Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
i have been gettin around 230 mile to a tank in my 1200 9n.
i decided to test out optimax, i filled up as usual and out of a tank i got 285 this time round. better quality fuel means the engine doesnt run as rich maybe??
anyone got any idea's?
i think il be payin the extra fiver for the tank of it from now on.
Better quality fuel means a cleaner burn means more efficient engine? Plus the higher quality of the fuel means you need less of it for the same performance, Optimax is the business. Glad you like it! It's definitely worth that little bit extra
I use Sainsbury's super unleaded get around 300mpg from a full tank and my journeys are no longer than 20mins.
Also you get the joy of it being alot cheaper than Shell.
I've tried using BP Ultimate but I always get more miles using Sainsbury's Super. I must admit I've never tried Optimax but I think I would rather stay with more miles for less money.
400 mile!! lucky thing. i think my tank is near 40L, cost about £32 to fill and the most i have ever got is 320miles drivin to manchester and back.
i live right in the centre of newcastle so i do alot of stop start driving and i have a heavy foot now and again, but i have slowed down alot since i modded my car and got more experienced at driving.
im not sure on my mpg figure, no computer on the E spec. i think il stick with the optimax anyway, seems better for the engine
Talking about economy, the handbook says that the 1st 3 miles of any journey is really bad for fuel consumption, so if you do lots of short journeys the MPG will be pants.
Off for my 1st long run out in my 9N tomorrow, (Glasgow) can't wait for it to be run in so I can start upping the rev's.