Polo Gti (AVY) Tuning Results (read further on)

Chat about your MKV (6N2) Polo GTi
poussou
Bronze Member
Posts: 155
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 3:56 pm
Location: Greece-Athens

Post by poussou »

twisty b-road wrote:I'm looking into this at the moment (it's an AVY Lupo though :oops: but there is always good info here)
I have some doubts as to whether the Schrick 256 degree are extreme enough for what I want. I should say that I don't mind loss of low rev torque. 170bhp at 7500rpm has been done in Germany
I have e-mailed Schrick and spoken to a few Shrick suppliers, but cannot get an answer as to why 256 is the most extreme profile they offer. Looking at other engines, conventionally speaking, I would be looking for a late 260/early 270 profile. It has been suggested to me that 256 is the most extreme profile they offer due to the variable timing on the inlet cam. I wish I could find out/understand for certain
A set of custom made piper cams would be over £1000, I didn't bother calling Kent or Cat as I thought the price would be the same
In my opinion replacing the cams and then not remapping the ECU will never extract the full potential of the cams as the engine still believes it's running the mild standard profile.
I'll be happy to give you a hand...
Besides, all AVY Polo's (2nd generation) are same as Lupo Gti'w from an engine standpoint.
And here it goes...

I did EXTENSIVE reading and talked a lot to Schrick before "investing" in these cams.At that time, the discution was on a level of .. "why aren't there more agressive cams" and now i realise Schrick didn't acutally make these cams for the Gti, as more like for the "variable timing" engines of the group.His answer to my question was that there where problems with the EPC when using more agressive ones.

Right now i know for a fact (after alot investigating work and discussion) that these cams ARE actually agressive for this car !!The original VW cams where in the range of 205 in /215 ex range, with the intake cam variable, as already noted.This makes a difference of ~50 degrees intake and ~30 degrees exhaust from stock !! Thats not mild by ANY standards.

As far as the ECU reprograming is concerned, it IS actually OBLIGATORY with these cams.And the main reason for this as i have come to believe is not actually the fueling part, as much as the IGNITION TIMING part, since its completely off due to the totally different cam timing.As already stated, a drop in effective compression might also amplify the low rev loss, but i'm not the one to lay a hand on the Williams head for now.....

It took me about the year to get the courage and money to decide to do it, and now the wait IS OVER.Next week im getting the car on the dyno, for a custom reprogram job.Its really weird but there are A LOT of Gti owners (even around the world) looking forward to the results.Thats a part of being a tuning pioneer of sorts. :wink: :wink: .
I'm keeping my fingers crossed and will let you guys know...
I hope it won't be disapointing... :roll: :roll:

P.S. 1)After some more reaserch i came to the conclusion (pretty logical and stupid of me not to realise earlier) that there CAN'T BE an adjustable intake geat (much like the VVTi Toyotas) since the intake cam is controlled by the ECU and sensors.Hence the "variable term".There can be though an adlustable Exhaust cam gear, but don't really know the usefullness of that.
2)Getting the Gti engine to 7200 rpm will be some task cause due to the Hydraulic lifters its like living dangerously.Most "normal" hydraulic lifters start having problems around 7000 rpm.There are however "high rev" hydraulics, but dont know if the Gti has them.
Last edited by poussou on Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
twisty b-road
New
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2004 6:33 pm
Location: Fraggle Rock

Post by twisty b-road »

poussou wrote:I did EXTENSIVE reading and talked a lot to Schrick before "investing" in these cams.At that time, the discution was on a level of .. "why aren't there more agressive cams"
Right now i know for a fact (after alot investigating work and discussion) that these cams ARE actually agressive for this car
That's exactly the question I asked of Schrick and exactly the info I was looking for, good work dude 8) I couldn't get an answer from Schrick.
poussou wrote:Getting the Gti engine to 7200 rpm will be some task
There's a guy on clublupo Nick (Dogwood) who runs 205bhp @9000rpm from a 1600. Some of his posts are here
http://forum.clublupo.co.uk/viewtopic.p ... 06&start=0
The engine owes him a LOT of money, way too much money for my needs, but he says that the standard valve gear and internals are good for 8000rpm and that this is proven in Germany. Seeing what he's done to his engine I have no reason to doubt him, though the usual disclaimers apply here. I can get a set of custom made internals made locally - I need to make that decision very soon. If I could rev it a bit harder to about 7250-7500 I feel this still leaves me some safety margin. With what I have planned I will revving to 7250 or 7500 by the summer. I will either be a very happy man or have huge repair bill, I will make sure I let you know

Anyway poussou, sit back and chill with one my special virtual beers Image
poussou
Bronze Member
Posts: 155
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 3:56 pm
Location: Greece-Athens

Post by poussou »

twisty b-road wrote: That's exactly the question I asked of Schrick and exactly the info I was looking for, good work dude 8) I couldn't get an answer from Schrick.
Unfortunately Schrick didn't know squat about the Gti engine.The original cam timing and duration was discovered through WinElsa :wink: :wink:
twisty b-road wrote: There's a guy on clublupo Nick (Dogwood) who runs 205bhp @9000rpm from a 1600. Some of his posts are here
http://forum.clublupo.co.uk/viewtopic.p ... 06&start=0
The engine owes him a LOT of money, way too much money for my needs, but he says that the standard valve gear and internals are good for 8000rpm and that this is proven in Germany. Seeing what he's done to his engine I have no reason to doubt him, though the usual disclaimers apply here. I can get a set of custom made internals made locally - I need to make that decision very soon. If I could rev it a bit harder to about 7250-7500 I feel this still leaves me some safety margin. With what I have planned I will revving to 7250 or 7500 by the summer. I will either be a very happy man or have huge repair bill, I will make sure I let you know


Well my fear insn't really about the pistons but about the valves and valve lifters.Normaly cars reving above 7000+ require harder springs, fact that makes the "sensitive" hydraulic ones prone to damage....
The pistons are reenforced mainly due to the high compression ratio anyway.

By the way....TOMORROW IS THE BIG DAY !!! :twisted: :twisted:
Getting dynoed and programmed :wink: :wink:

KEEP YOUR FINGERS CROSSED !!!!
twisty b-road wrote: Anyway poussou, sit back and chill with one my special virtual beers Image


Cheers m8 :wink:
poussou
Bronze Member
Posts: 155
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 3:56 pm
Location: Greece-Athens

Post by poussou »

Well folks i just wanted to let everyone know of the results of the dyno tuning...

The previous ECU program was really f*cked up and was causing detonation ALL OVER the rpm range.I do not know if that fact has caused any damage to the pistons (hopefully not) but the car was reprogrammed to stop detonation and match the new camshafts.

The results where :

127 HP @ WHEELS
148.48 Nm @ WHEELS

There was a "plus" increase of 7 HP at the wheels from the previous (crap) software, and now maximum torque comes at ~5200 rpm.
There is still stuff to do like compression nad porting, so this is probably not the final number...

I will try to give more data later on.

Please do comment on the results.
Last edited by poussou on Sun Feb 27, 2005 8:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
dubpolo
Sponsor
Posts: 1494
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 12:08 am
Location: ellesmere port

Post by dubpolo »

ant that 25 bhp up on standard! :shock: :shock: please list exactly what you have done!
poussou
Bronze Member
Posts: 155
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 3:56 pm
Location: Greece-Athens

Post by poussou »

dubpolo wrote:ant that 25 bhp up on standard! :shock: :shock: please list exactly what you have done!
I KNOW !!!

Some people at the Greek forums said its about 140 at fly.....I SERIOUSLY doubt that...13 hp power lost seems to low.How much you reckon is that at fly ???
Still it is heard the original Gti is about 103 at wheels...Hmmmm
Here is the graph....:wink:

Image


P.S.The only thing i've done (if you can say "only") is

1)BMC CDA with front intake
2)ECU reprogramming on dyno
3)Schrick Camshafts
4)Free Remus exhaust

Still thinking about a compression increase,prot and polish, a different exhaust header, and maybe a variable exhaust geat.Whatt you think this engine can reach with all that ehhhh???
Last edited by poussou on Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Josh_PoloGTi
Site Admin
Posts: 2782
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 8:32 pm
Drives: BMW E85 Z4 3.0i
Location: Sheffield, UK
Contact:

Post by Josh_PoloGTi »

My GTi had something like 97bhp at the wheels iirc...

Very high losses.

Nice work mate! I bet it drives so much better now!
poussou
Bronze Member
Posts: 155
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 3:56 pm
Location: Greece-Athens

Post by poussou »

Josh_PoloGTi wrote:My GTi had something like 97bhp at the wheels iirc...

Very high losses.

Nice work mate! I bet it drives so much better now!
WOW...

Dude that means a 30 HP INCREASE !!!!! :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

ARE YOU CERTAIN ??????
User avatar
bstardchild
Moderator
Posts: 3057
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 9:53 pm
Location: Norfolk - "Its just Black & Dirty"

Post by bstardchild »

poussou wrote:
Josh_PoloGTi wrote:My GTi had something like 97bhp at the wheels iirc...

Very high losses.

Nice work mate! I bet it drives so much better now!
WOW...

Dude that means a 30 HP INCREASE !!!!! :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

ARE YOU CERTAIN ??????
I'd expect between 20 and 25% losses in the transmission on a manual and between 30 and 35% on an Auto so I reckon Josh is spot on!!!

And yeah 30 bhp increase if the dyno measured at the wheels and didn't used the slow down run to measure the losses seems very fair
User avatar
Josh_PoloGTi
Site Admin
Posts: 2782
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 8:32 pm
Drives: BMW E85 Z4 3.0i
Location: Sheffield, UK
Contact:

Post by Josh_PoloGTi »

I can't find the dyno printout (it was a long time ago when it was done), but it was definately UNDER 100bhp at the wheels.

The Flywheel power was about 120 (I had a faulty temperature sender at the time).
poussou
Bronze Member
Posts: 155
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 3:56 pm
Location: Greece-Athens

Post by poussou »

OMG this is really great news!!!

Yes the dyno measures BHP at the wheels only.....

But thennn we are talking about 150+ ???? at the fly !!!!

Is that possible ???

I mean i was optimistic...but THIS ????

And what will happen with compression and P&P ????

:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

Nah...This can't be true..... :lol: :lol: :lol:
dubpolo
Sponsor
Posts: 1494
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 12:08 am
Location: ellesmere port

Post by dubpolo »

that is ace! i think the two lads with standard GTi's got 100BHP at the wheels and 125 at the fly! so yea its about 25 BHP up. 150 BHP polo, bet its a nippy little bugger now!
poussou
Bronze Member
Posts: 155
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 3:56 pm
Location: Greece-Athens

Post by poussou »

Just wanted you guys to know i did a block 120 logging with VAG-COM and as it turns out i currently have 178Nm (18.1 Kg) of torque at the flywheel!!

I didn't do a complete horsepower calculation, but i'm really happy with these numbers.Can't say anything about the accuracy, but hey...thats what the ECU reads :lol: :lol:

Now keep in mind a Honda Type R put out about 196Nm form a fairly advanced 2 liter engine....

I'm soooo happy... :twisted: :twisted:
vdubit
Gold Member
Posts: 619
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 12:53 pm
Location: Exmouth, Devon
Contact:

Post by vdubit »

I know i'm bringing an old post back to life...

You state what power you had after the dyno, but you don't state how the car behaved. How did it behave? Did it still lag initially or was the power there throughout the rev range?

Looking at the graph it suggests it was good throughout.

If this is the case I'm just wondering as to why nobody else has done this.

Did you ever p&p the car and sort out the compression?

Cheers, Andy
jezmk4
Silver Member
Posts: 275
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 7:24 pm

Post by jezmk4 »

twisty b-road wrote: There's a guy on clublupo Nick (Dogwood) who runs 205bhp @9000rpm from a 1600. Some of his posts are here
http://forum.clublupo.co.uk/viewtopic.p ... 06&start=0
The engine owes him a LOT of money, way too much money for my needs, but he says that the standard valve gear and internals are good for 8000rpm and that this is proven in Germany. Seeing what he's done to his engine I have no reason to doubt him, though the usual disclaimers apply here. I can get a set of custom made internals made locally - I need to make that decision very soon. If I could rev it a bit harder to about 7250-7500 I feel this still leaves me some safety margin. With what I have planned I will revving to 7250 or 7500 by the summer. I will either be a very happy man or have huge repair bill, I will make sure I let you know
Yes, he uses a decent engine to start with though :wink:
Post Reply